Thoughts and commentary on Illinois HB 5485:
From the Chicago Tribune:
The recent push by local leaders in Illinois to address the growing burden of public employee pensions has highlighted a deepening crisis that affects not just Chicago, but also suburban and downstate communities. These towns are facing increasing pressure on their budgets due to rising pension costs, yet the state legislature appears more focused on other issues.
Instead of addressing the core issue of municipal pensions, lawmakers are advancing legislation that could further strain local taxpayers. A bill currently before the Senate would require municipalities to negotiate staffing levels for fire departments with unions, even if such terms aren't already in their contracts. If an agreement can't be reached, the matter would go to arbitration — effectively taking control away from local officials who are best positioned to make these decisions.
This move is seen as a win for firefighters' unions, who stand to gain more jobs, but it could lead to higher taxes and reduced services for residents. Once staffing levels are set through contract, cities may find it difficult to adapt to changing conditions or budget constraints. In Rockford, for example, past union agreements forced the city to overstaff its fire department, leading to cuts in police and other essential services during tough economic times.
Fire protection is vital, and small towns need flexibility to manage resources efficiently. Collaboration with neighboring towns might offer a cost-effective solution, but this law could discourage such efforts. While the union argues that minimum staffing ensures safety, there's little evidence that state-mandated rules improve service quality or public safety.
As the bill moves forward, it’s important to recognize what it really is: a hidden property tax increase. Local leaders should consider the long-term impact on their communities before voting.
From the SouthtownStar:
In response to a recent article about Oak Lawn Fire Department challenges, I want to correct some inaccuracies presented by Mayor Sandra Bury and the village. Here are key points:
1) House Bill 5485 does not impose minimum staffing requirements on fire vehicles. Instead, it requires that “minimum manning†be a subject of good-faith negotiations between municipalities and unions. The bill itself doesn’t mandate anything.
2) The claim that staffing isn’t about how many firefighters are on a truck but at the scene is misleading. Firefighters’ safety depends on having enough personnel on each unit and during shifts. This is why we negotiate staffing levels.
3) Oak Lawn has consistently underfunded its pension obligations, despite employees contributing regularly. It’s unfair to place the blame on the firefighters for this mismanagement.
4) The residency requirement for firefighters was lifted in the 1980s due to a federal discrimination investigation. Not living in Oak Lawn doesn’t affect a firefighter’s right to a safe working environment.
5) Village manager Larry Deetjen mentions high overtime costs, but fails to mention that the number of firefighters has dropped significantly since 2007, while call volume has increased. Overtime costs are offset by lower labor expenses, and no new firefighters have been hired in over a decade.
Vincent Griffin President Oak Lawn Professional Firefighters Association
Thanks, Dan.
Previous posts are HERE, HERE, and HERE.
Jiangsu Hualong Printing Co.;Ltd , http://www.hlpackingtop.com